Dior’s Jewellery Designers The Sustainability Profile

Dior is a luxury fashion house with some public sustainability activity, but independent sources say it still has a long way to go. Press coverage highlights work on biodiversity, responsible sourcing, eco-design, and packaging made with recycled materials. Good On You, an independent fashion rating site, says Dior has made some progress but still rates it “Not Good Enough” because it does not show enough evidence on materials, chemicals, worker pay, or animal welfare. Consumer review sites also show weak satisfaction overall, which adds to a mixed public picture.

Positive Sentiment Found
Independent coverage gives Dior some credit for visible sustainability steps in beauty. Press articles describe the #BeautyAsALegacy initiative, which focuses on biodiversity, responsible sourcing, eco-design, and packaging with more than 90% recycled materials in gift packaging. The same coverage says Dior has worked with female flower producers in Grasse since 2006 and has highlighted gardens that supply ingredients for perfumes and makeup. Good On You also notes some progress, including lower-impact materials and a supply-chain emissions target. These are real positive signals, but they sit alongside major gaps, so the overall positive picture is limited rather than strong.

Common Criticisms:
The strongest third-party signal is negative. Good On You rates Dior “Not Good Enough” and says the brand still lacks evidence on key issues such as living wages, full chemical removal, textile waste reduction, and animal welfare. It also says Dior scored only 21-30% in the Fashion Transparency Index, which suggests limited public disclosure about supply-chain practices. On Trustpilot, Dior’s customer reviews are very poor, with a 1.5 out of 5 rating based on more than 11,000 reviews, and users complain about quality and customer service. Together, these sources suggest that public trust is weak and that Dior has not yet shown enough clear, verified progress on ESG issues.