Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - 3/5
- Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
- B Corp - Not found
- Trustpilot - 3.5/5
- This is an unclaimed profile. Arc'teryx has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
Arc'teryx shows a mixed but fairly active sustainability profile. It has public climate targets, repair and resale programs, and several material and labour certifications. It also reports progress on recycled materials, PFAS-free chemistry, and circular design. At the same time, third-party reviewers say it still relies on high-impact synthetic materials and does not appear on track for some 2030 goals. Public ratings place it in the middle of the pack rather than at the top. Overall, the brand seems to be making real changes, but it still has clear gaps in materials, packaging, and emissions progress. Positive Sentiment Found Public third-party coverage gives Arc'teryx a generally positive but not top-tier sustainability image. Good On You rates it 3 out of 5 overall and says it is “It’s a start,” pointing to some lower-impact materials, repair services, a confidential worker complaints channel, and some certified final production. The Commons Earth gives it a “Great+” sustainability rating and highlights repair, resale, take-back, and public emissions reporting, while Better Trail describes strong transparency, a detailed sustainability page, and clear reporting on recycled materials, PFAS-free chemistry, and circular programs. Better Trail also notes that Arc'teryx has made progress on recycled nylon and polyester, and that most products are now PFAS free. These sources suggest the brand is active and more transparent than many peers, even if it still has room to improve. Common Criticisms: The main criticism is that Arc'teryx still depends heavily on high-impact synthetic materials and has not shown enough progress to prove it will meet all of its targets. The Commons Earth says the brand remains reliant on fossil-fuel-based synthetics and does not appear on track for its 2030 emissions goals. Better Trail says it missed interim recycled-material targets, especially for nylon and polyester, and that packaging data is still thin. Good On You also notes there is no evidence the brand is taking strong action to minimise packaging and no evidence it is on track with its science-based target. Trustpilot shows mixed consumer sentiment on product quality, with one Arc'teryx review page showing an average TrustScore of 3.5 out of 5 on the Australian site, while the main review page indicates many customer complaints about quality issues. Overall, the concerns are about pace, transparency, and delivery rather than a single scandal.
Arc’teryx Sustainability Actions
Arc’teryx Sustainability Commitments
2030
Use only recycled nylon and polyester
Arc'teryx has said it wants to replace 100% of its virgin nylon and polyester with recycled fabrics by 2030. Nylon and polyester are common synthetic materials, and making them from recycled sources can reduce demand for new fossil-fuel-based feedstocks. The brand has already made progress, but third-party analysis says it is not yet fully on track.
2030
Switch to low-impact materials
The company has a target to move to 100% low-impact, traceable materials by 2030. Traceable means the brand can follow materials back through the supply chain. This kind of goal is meant to reduce environmental harm and make sourcing easier to check, but independent reviewers say the brand still relies on some high-impact synthetic fibres.
2030
Power half of production with renewables
Arc'teryx has a goal for 50% of all production to be powered by renewable energy by 2030. Renewable energy means power from sources like wind or solar instead of fossil fuels. The company says it has reported progress, but third-party reviewers say it has not shared enough detail to show it is clearly on track.