S.C. Johnson & Son is a long-running household products company with a mixed sustainability picture. It has public climate targets, has been linked to renewable electricity use in the US, and has been recognised by some third-party trackers for palm oil sourcing and plastic packaging work. At the same time, several independent benchmarks and consumer review sites show weak results on climate transition, social issues, and product trust. Public criticism also includes animal testing, a past deceptive marketing settlement, and low Trustpilot scores. Overall, the company appears active on some environmental topics, but outside ratings suggest its ESG performance is uneven and often questioned. Positive Sentiment Found Independent sources show some positive sustainability signals. DitchCarbon says the company has near-term Science Based Targets initiative commitments and a 2030 emissions-cut target, while the EPA Green Power Partnership listing says it used renewable energy for 62% of its US electricity. Third-party ratings also point to some progress: CDP gave it a B for climate change and a B- for water security, and As You Sow gave it a B in its 2024 Plastic Promises Scorecard. The palm oil rating from WAZA was “Excellent,” which suggests stronger sourcing practices in that area. Together, these sources show that the company has made visible moves on energy, climate, packaging, and palm oil. Common Criticisms: The negative picture is stronger than the positive one in the third-party material. Trustpilot shows very low consumer scores, with SC Johnson at 1.6 out of 5 from 45 reviews and another related page at 1.9 out of 5 from 13 reviews. Independent benchmarks are also weak: the World Benchmarking Alliance gave the company 0/100 for Just Transition, 1.4/100 for the Social Benchmark, 1.3/100 for the Nature Benchmark, 3.1/100 for the Ocean Benchmark, and 10/100 for the Gender Benchmark. It also received a G grade in ACT Core, which means its climate transition plan was judged uncommitted. Other criticism includes a 2021 settlement over misleading “non-toxic” claims for Method products, a PETA listing for animal testing, and an EWG product safety range where over 87% of products scored D or F. This points to weak trust and mixed ESG performance overall.
About S.C. Johnson & Son
- Status
- Unverified
- Website
- Visit Website
S.C. Johnson & Son Sustainability Actions
S.C. Johnson & Son Sustainability Commitments
2030
Cut total emissions by 62%
The company has a near-term Science Based Targets initiative commitment to cut total greenhouse gas emissions by 62% by 2030 from a 2019 baseline. Science Based Targets are climate goals checked against what scientists say is needed to limit warming. This target covers the company’s full emissions footprint, not just its own buildings and factories.
2040
Reduce Scope 3 intensity
The company has a 2040 target to cut Scope 3 emissions intensity by 50%. Scope 3 means emissions from the wider value chain, such as suppliers, transport, and product use. Because this is intensity-based, the target is about emissions per unit of activity rather than a simple total cut.