Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - Not good enough
- Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
- B Corp - Not listed
- Trustpilot - No
- This is an unclaimed profile. Swarovski has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
Swarovski appears to have a mixed sustainability profile. Independent rating sources say it has started work on lower-impact materials, emissions cuts, and water savings, but it still lacks full public detail on materials, suppliers, and some worker protections. Good On You rates it “Not good enough,” mainly because it does not publish enough information to show strong progress across people, planet, and animals. Third-party coverage also says the company has set targets for recycled and responsibly sourced materials, waste reduction, and packaging changes by 2030. At the same time, independent commentary notes past concerns about supply chain labour and governance. Positive Sentiment Found Public sentiment is mixed, but there are some clear positive signals. Good On You gives Swarovski a Planet score of 3 out of 5, People 2 out of 5, and Animals 2 out of 5, with an overall rating of “Not good enough,” which still shows that the brand has some visible sustainability steps in place. The same source says Swarovski uses some lower-impact materials, has set a science-based target to cut greenhouse gases, and uses a closed-loop water system. Third-party coverage also points to a sustainability report, renewable energy use, recycled water use, lab-grown diamonds, recycled gold, and a Responsible Jewellery Council certification, which is a standard for jewellery companies covering responsible business practices. Common Criticisms: The negative picture is stronger than the positive one. Good On You rates Swarovski “Not good enough” overall and says it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials or suppliers, which means outsiders cannot fully check how its claims add up. It also says there is no evidence of living wages in the supply chain and no evidence of an animal welfare policy. Independent commentary from illuminem flags controversy around labour compliance in Vietnamese, Thai, and Chinese contract manufacturing, and notes governance concerns linked to the family ownership structure and 2022 layoffs of 6,000 employees. Trustpilot also shows a large volume of customer reviews for the main site, but the scraped material does not include a clear sustainability-specific review score there.
About Swarovski
- Status
- Unverified
- Website
- Visit Website
Swarovski Sustainability Actions
Swarovski Sustainability Commitments
2030
Source metals responsibly
Swarovski says that by 2030 all metals will come from responsibly managed and recycled suppliers. This means it plans to buy metals from sources that are meant to reduce harm and use more recycled input. The commitment is broad, but the company has not publicly shared a full breakdown of current sourcing, so outside readers cannot yet check how far along it is.
2030
Reduce emissions by 47%
The company has said it aims to cut emissions from its own operations by 47 percent by 2030. It also plans a 28 percent cut in emissions outside its operations by the same year. These targets are part of its climate plan, but the available material does not show full progress data, so it is hard to judge how close it is to meeting them.
2030
Make packaging recyclable
Swarovski says all packaging will be sustainable or recyclable by 2030. Recyclable packaging can be processed and used again after collection, while sustainable is a broad term that needs more detail to be useful. The commitment is clear on timing, but the public material does not explain the exact packaging standards or how much of the change has already happened.