Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - It's a start
- Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
- B Corp - Not listed
- Trustpilot - No
- This is an unclaimed profile. Ugg Australia has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
UGG’s sustainability picture is mixed. Independent ratings say the brand has started to improve, especially on materials, supply chain disclosure, and repair services, but it still leaves important gaps. Good On You says it uses some lower-impact materials and has set science-based emissions targets, but it does not publish a full breakdown of materials or show that it is on track. The Commons Earth notes stronger reporting at parent-company level, including emissions data, renewable energy use in owned sites, and supplier disclosure, but also points out missing packaging detail and no take-back scheme. Public sentiment is limited, with some praise for service and some complaints about product durability. Positive Sentiment Found Public sentiment is limited, but there are some positive signals. Trustpilot snippets include a review calling the service great and the slippers beautiful, although that same review also notes sizing issues. On the sustainability side, Good On You and The Commons Earth both give UGG a middle-of-the-road picture rather than a poor one. Good On You says the brand uses some lower-impact materials, has a code of conduct, audits some of its supply chain, and has set science-based emissions targets. The Commons Earth gives stronger marks for accountability, saying Deckers publishes emissions data, uses 100% renewable energy in owned and operated facilities, and discloses supplier names and locations. It also notes repair services and a one-year warranty, which can help products last longer. Common Criticisms: The main criticism is that UGG still leaves important sustainability gaps. Good On You says it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials, does not show evidence of living wages in its supply chain, and is not on track with its science-based emissions target. The Commons Earth says packaging information is missing, there is no take-back programme, and the company does not state that it regularly audits supply chain partners, which can leave labour and environmental risks less visible. Consumer reviews also show product quality concerns: one Trustpilot snippet says a Christmas present fell apart in less than six months, which points to durability complaints. Independent ratings are better on reporting than on full performance, but they still describe a brand that has room to improve.
About Ugg Australia
- Status
- Unverified
- Website
- Visit Website
Ugg Australia Sustainability Actions
Ugg Australia Sustainability Commitments
2025
Cut hazardous chemicals
Good On You says UGG has set a target to eliminate hazardous chemicals after 2025 and claims it is on track. Hazardous chemicals are substances that can harm workers, communities, or nature if they are not handled carefully. This is a future-facing commitment with a clear year target, so it belongs in commitments rather than actions.
2021
Adopt science-based targets
Deckers is listed on We Mean Business as having committed to adopt a science-based emissions reduction target. Science-based targets are climate goals that are checked against climate science, so they are meant to be more credible than vague promises. The source does not give a later deadline for the target itself, but it does show a formal climate commitment.